Thanks!
Hi Lola
Thanks so much. Interestingly, the time my diagnosis was "removed" was the only occasion on which I didn't see Professor Hughes - and instead saw a doctor I hadn't seen before together with a bunch of medical students.
I think I'll start the process again, if only to check things out properly. Do you happen to know which of the ANA or the Anti-DNA is considered the more accurate in diagnosing lupus? My Anti-DNA's were usually (though not always) positive but it was the ANA (the first time that I'd had that test as we're talking so long ago now) which came back negative and led to the withdrawal of the diagnosis.
Thanks again for your input. I hadn't thought I was "cured" as, when I was diagnosed all those years ago, the prognosis was terrible and cures seemed a very long way off, but I just thought that my original diagnosis must have been a mistake and that this ANA test categorically proved it. I feel stupid now given how many years Professor Hughes thought I had it - should have trusted his opinion and argued the case back then, I guess! Mind you, given that I've plodded on with all the same symptoms and no real treatment ever since, I guess that might encourage people who've just been diagnosed and and are scared. When I was diagnosed in 78, lupus was perceived as a death sentence, and that seems to be far from the case these days - so at least that's something!
Hi Lola
Thanks so much. Interestingly, the time my diagnosis was "removed" was the only occasion on which I didn't see Professor Hughes - and instead saw a doctor I hadn't seen before together with a bunch of medical students.
I think I'll start the process again, if only to check things out properly. Do you happen to know which of the ANA or the Anti-DNA is considered the more accurate in diagnosing lupus? My Anti-DNA's were usually (though not always) positive but it was the ANA (the first time that I'd had that test as we're talking so long ago now) which came back negative and led to the withdrawal of the diagnosis.
Thanks again for your input. I hadn't thought I was "cured" as, when I was diagnosed all those years ago, the prognosis was terrible and cures seemed a very long way off, but I just thought that my original diagnosis must have been a mistake and that this ANA test categorically proved it. I feel stupid now given how many years Professor Hughes thought I had it - should have trusted his opinion and argued the case back then, I guess! Mind you, given that I've plodded on with all the same symptoms and no real treatment ever since, I guess that might encourage people who've just been diagnosed and and are scared. When I was diagnosed in 78, lupus was perceived as a death sentence, and that seems to be far from the case these days - so at least that's something!