"that if the sm test and Anti-DNA are negative than most likely you don't have Lupus"
Hi postie
That isn't true. Only about a third of people with lupus have positive anti-Sm and about one half have the anti -dsDNA antibodies
But if those antibodies are present they would confirm a diagnosis if there are enough other typical symptoms and signs. .
Diagnosis is essentially clinical backed up by blood tests.The "other symptoms" part is important. A high ANA an indeterminate rash and a low white blood cell count would not necessarily suffice for a lupus diagnosis. Even an ANA of 640 might not mean lupus.
Cheers
Clare
PS I started a new thread for your question which is preferable to tagging it on to an existing thread. To start a new thread go to the front page of the section and click on New Thread at top or bottom left of the page
I also gave it a specific title
Hi postie
That isn't true. Only about a third of people with lupus have positive anti-Sm and about one half have the anti -dsDNA antibodies
But if those antibodies are present they would confirm a diagnosis if there are enough other typical symptoms and signs. .
Diagnosis is essentially clinical backed up by blood tests.The "other symptoms" part is important. A high ANA an indeterminate rash and a low white blood cell count would not necessarily suffice for a lupus diagnosis. Even an ANA of 640 might not mean lupus.
Cheers
Clare
PS I started a new thread for your question which is preferable to tagging it on to an existing thread. To start a new thread go to the front page of the section and click on New Thread at top or bottom left of the page